Each year , 10 million Americans compact up their living and move to another part of the country . But where are they going ? The University of Wisconsin - Madison has made anawesome interactive mapthat chase the net migration to different county across the U.S.
The map uses data point sets that admit historic period , race , Hispanic - origin , and sexual activity to trace migration patterns from 1950 to 2010 . Purple means that more people are moving to a county , and orange means more people are moving by from a county .
Over the past ten age , the county seeing the biggest gains are in southwestern Nevada , westerly Arizona and pretty much all of Florida . ( On the real map you’re able to also see Alaska and Hawaii . Hi , Alaska and Hawaii ! Sorry ! ) This is most likely due to Americans who are inhabit longer , and moving to these place to pull back . If I select only to foreground the migration design for 54- to 74 - yr - old , it becomes obvious :

The coolest thing isplaying with the datum on the website , where you’re able to cut and slice the data between counties and get going to see some trends up close , specially when it comes to the long time of who is move . Just seem at some of those dark purplish counties on a chart ( St. Lucie in Florida , Nye in Nevada , and Mohave in Arizona ) , confirms the boomer population godsend :
Whoa . Some of these areas also have growth in the young , menage - producing range , but you’re able to see a clear protuberance around the retreat long time , as these warm , sunny counties receive their fresh grey - haired residents .
It finger like everyone I know is move to Austin , Texas , so I plugged in the county for Austin ( Travis County ) , and , for comparison , Brooklyn , New York ( Kings County ) ; and Portland , Oregon ( Multnomah County ) over the last 30 eld or so :

you could see a vindicated stiletto heel in each metropolis where young , impressionable 20- and 30 - somethings are move to town , but especially in Austin where they ’ve arrived in cockeyed bit . Brooklyn and Portland ’s new residents skew a little old , but they ’re still coming .
It ’s also interesting to look at place that have seen negative migration practice , like Detroit , Michigan ( Wayne County ) ; St. Louis , Missouri ( St. Louis City County ) ; and Buffalo , New York ( Erie County ):
More people have almost uniformly moved away from these counties in the last few decades . The one big elision is in St. Louis , which is now gaining 20 - somethings at charge per unit that look more like Brooklyn ’s growth for the same age range of mountains .

I tally a few more decades , live on all the way back to the 1950s for more perspective :
Here , when you may see the trend over time , you may really witness the dramatic changes in St. Louis , which was bleed 30 - somethings in the ’ 50s , ’ 60s and ’ 70s , but now gaining younger common people . The news is not as good in Buffalo , which was once a pretty pop address with the same eld group , but not anymore .
Of course , one thing to remember is that counties come in all shapes and size and can encompass an entire metropolitan area , carve up a big city , or be much , much larger than the urbanized field within them . And of course , these do n’t take into story how people move within counties , from city to suburb , for example . But as a method of measuring the approaching - and - goings of Americans , it ’s a fairly awing agency to look at where we take to go . [ Flowing DataviaWashington Monthly ]

Datamapsmigration
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , skill , and culture news show in your inbox day by day .
newsworthiness from the futurity , fork over to your nowadays .
You May Also Like










![]()
